Using L3 (BGP) routing for your Ceph storage

Many Ceph storage environments out there are deployed using a L2 underlay.

This means that the Ceph servers (MON, OSD, etc) are connected using LACP/Bonding to a pair of switches. On their ‘bond0’ device (example) they are assigned an IPv4/IPv6 address and this is used for connectivity between the Ceph nodes and the Ceph clients.

Although this works fine, I try to avoid L2 as much as possible in datacenter deployments. L2 scales up to a certain point, but it has it’s limitations. Modern Top-of-Rack (ToR) switches can easily route traffic and wire-speed. This used to be a limitation of switches in the past. When designing environments I prefer using a L3 approach.

This blogpost is there to show you the rough concept. It’s NOT a copy and paste tutorial. You will need to adapt it to your situation.

Network setup and BGP configuration

Using Juniper QFX5100 switches and Frrouting on the Ceph nodes I’ve established BGP sessions between the ToR and Ceph nodes according to the diagram below.

Each nodes has two independent BGP sessions with the Top-of-Rack in it’s rack. Via these BGP sessions they advertise their local IPv6 /128 address. Via the same sessions they receive a default ::/0 IPv6 route.

ceph01# sh bgp summary 

IPv6 Unicast Summary (VRF default):
BGP router identifier 1.2.3.4, local AS number 65101 vrf-id 0
BGP table version 10875
RIB entries 511, using 96 KiB of memory
Peers 2, using 1448 KiB of memory
Peer groups 1, using 64 bytes of memory

Neighbor        V    AS   MsgRcvd   MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ  Up/Down State/PfxRcd   PfxSnt Desc
enp196s0f0np0   4 65002    487385    353917        0    0    0 3d18h17m            1        1 N/A
enp196s0f1np1   4 65002    558998    411452        0    0    0 01:38:55            1        1 N/A

Total number of neighbors 2
ceph01#

Here we see two BGP sessions active over both NICs of the Ceph node. We can also see that a default IPv6 route is received via BGP.

ceph01# sh ipv6 route ::/0
Routing entry for ::/0
  Known via "bgp", distance 20, metric 0
  Last update 01:42:00 ago
    fe80::e29:efff:fed7:4719, via enp196s0f0np0, weight 1
    fe80::7686:e2ff:fe7c:a19e, via enp196s0f1np1, weight 1

ceph01# 

The Frrouting configuration ( /etc/frr/frr.conf ) is fairly simple:

frr defaults traditional
hostname ceph01
log syslog informational
no ip forwarding
no ipv6 forwarding
service integrated-vtysh-config
!
interface enp196s0f0np0
 no ipv6 nd suppress-ra
exit
!
interface enp196s0f1np1
 no ipv6 nd suppress-ra
exit
!
interface lo
 ipv6 address 2001:db8:100:1::/128
exit
!
router bgp 65101
 bgp router-id 1.2.3.4
 no bgp ebgp-requires-policy
 no bgp default ipv4-unicast
 no bgp network import-check
 neighbor upstream peer-group
 neighbor upstream remote-as external
 neighbor enp196s0f0np0 interface peer-group upstream
 neighbor enp196s0f1np1 interface peer-group upstream
 !
 address-family ipv6 unicast
  redistribute connected
  neighbor upstream activate
 exit-address-family
exit
!
end

On the Juniper switches a configuration was defined for the BGP Unnumbered (RFC5549) configuration as well. This blogpost explains very well on how BGP Unnumbered works on JunOS, I am not going to repeat it. I will highlight a couple of pieces of configuration.

root@tor01# show interfaces xe-0/0/1
description ceph01;
unit 0 {
    mtu 9216;
    family inet6;
}

root@tor01# show protocols router-advertisement 
interface xe-0/0/1.0;
root@tor01# show | compare 
[edit]
+  policy-options {
+      as-list bgp_unnumbered_as_list members 65101-65199;
+  }
[edit protocols]
+   bgp {
+       group ceph {
+           family inet6 {
+               unicast;
+           }
+           multipath;
+           export default-v6;
+           import ceph-loopback;
+           dynamic-neighbor bgp_unnumbered {
+               peer-auto-discovery {
+                   family inet6 {
+                       ipv6-nd;
+                   }
+                   interface xe-0/0/1.0;
+                   interface xe-0/0/2.0;
+                   interface xe-0/0/3.0;
+               }
+           }
+           peer-as-list bgp_unnumbered_as_list;
+       }
+   }
[edit policy]
+ policy-statement default-v6 {
+    from {
+        route-filter ::/0 exact;
+   }
+   then accept;
+}
+ policy-statement ceph-loopback {
+    from {
+        route-filter 2001:db8:100::/64 upto /128;
+   }
+   then accept;
+}

This will set up the BGP sessions via the interfaces xe-0/0/1 until xe-0/0/3 using IPv6 Autodiscovery.

The Ceph nodes should now be able to ping the other nodes:

PING 2001:db8:100::2(2001:db8:100::2) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2001:db8:100::2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.058 ms
64 bytes from 2001:db8:100::2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=0.063 ms
64 bytes from 2001:db8:100::2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=0.071 ms

--- 2001:db8:100::2 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2037ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.058/0.064/0.071/0.005 ms

Ceph configuration

From Ceph’s perspective there is not much to do. We just need to specify the IPv6 subnet Ceph is allowed to use and bind to.

[global]
	 mon_host = 2001:db8:100::1, 2001:db8:100::2, 2001:db8:100::3
	 ms_bind_ipv4 = false
	 ms_bind_ipv6 = true
	 public_network = 2001:db8:100::/64

This is all the configuration needed for Ceph 🙂

wdh@ceph01:~$ sudo ceph health
HEALTH_OK
wdh@infra-04-01-17:~$ sudo ceph mon dump
election_strategy: 1
0: [v2:[2001:db8:100::1]:3300/0,v1:[2001:db8:100::1]:6789/0] mon.ceph01
1: [v2:[2001:db8:100::2]:3300/0,v1:[2001:db8:100::2]:6789/0] mon.ceph02
2: [v2:[2001:db8:100::3]:3300/0,v1:[2001:db8:100::3]:6789/0] mon.ceph02
dumped monmap epoch 6
wdh@infra-04-01-17:~$ 

VXLAN with VyOS and Ubuntu 18.04

VXLAN

Virtual Extensible LAN uses encapsulation technique to encapsulate OSI layer 2 Ethernet frames within layer 4 UDP datagrams. More on this can be found on the link provided.

For a Ceph and CloudStack environment I needed to set up a Proof-of-Concept using VXLAN and some refurbished hardware. The main purpose of this PoC is to verify that VXLAN works with CloudStack, Ceph and Ubuntu 18.04

VyOS

VyOS is an open source network operating system based on Debian Linux. It supports VXLAN, so using this we were able to test VXLAN in this setup.

In production a other VXLAN capable router would be used, but for a PoC VyOS works just fine running on a regular server.

Configuration

The VyOS router is connected to ‘the internet’ with one NIC and the other NIC is connected to a switch.

Using static routes a IPv4 subnet (/24) and a IPv6 subnet (/48) are routed towards the VyOS router. These are then splitted and send to multiple VLANs.

As it took me a while to configure VXLAN under VyOS

I’m only posting that configuration.

interfaces {
    ethernet eth0 {
        address 31.25.96.130/30
        address 2a00:f10:100:1d::2/64
        duplex auto
        hw-id 00:25:90:80:ed:fe
        smp-affinity auto
        speed auto
    }
    ethernet eth5 {
        duplex auto
        hw-id a0:36:9f:0d:ab:be
        mtu 9000
        smp-affinity auto
        speed auto
        vif 300 {
            address 192.168.0.1/24
            description VXLAN
            mtu 9000
        }
    vxlan vxlan1000 {
        address 10.0.0.1/23
        address 2a00:f10:114:1000::1/64
        group 239.0.3.232
        ip {
            enable-arp-accept
            enable-arp-announce
        }
        ipv6 {
            dup-addr-detect-transmits 1
            router-advert {
                cur-hop-limit 64
                link-mtu 1500
                managed-flag false
                max-interval 600
                name-server 2a00:f10:ff04:153::53
                name-server 2a00:f10:ff04:253::53
                other-config-flag false
                prefix 2a00:f10:114:1000::/64 {
                    autonomous-flag true
                    on-link-flag true
                    valid-lifetime 2592000
                }
                reachable-time 0
                retrans-timer 0
                send-advert true
            }
        }
        link eth5.300
        mtu 1500
        vni 1000
    }
    vxlan vxlan2000 {
        address 109.72.91.1/26
        address 2a00:f10:114:2000::1/64
        group 239.0.7.208
        ipv6 {
            dup-addr-detect-transmits 1
            router-advert {
                cur-hop-limit 64
                link-mtu 1500
                managed-flag false
                max-interval 600
                name-server 2a00:f10:ff04:153::53
                name-server 2a00:f10:ff04:253::53
                other-config-flag false
                prefix 2a00:f10:114:2000::/64 {
                    autonomous-flag true
                    on-link-flag true
                    valid-lifetime 2592000
                }
                reachable-time 0
                retrans-timer 0
                send-advert true
            }
        }
        link eth5.300
        mtu 1500
        vni 2000
    }
}

VLAN 300 on eth5 is used to route VNI 1000 and 2000 in their own multicast groups.

The MTU of eth5 is set to 9000 so that the encapsulated traffic of VXLAN can still be 1500 bytes.

Ubuntu 18.04

To test if VXLAN was actually working on the Ubuntu 18.04 host I made a very simple script:

ip link add vxlan1000 type vxlan id 1000 dstport 4789 group 239.0.3.232 dev vlan300 ttl 5
ip link set up dev vxlan1000
ip addr add 10.0.0.11/23 dev vxlan1000
ip addr add 2a00:f10:114:1000::101/64 dev vxlan1000

That works! I can ping 10.0.0.11 and 2a00:f10:114:1000::1 from my Ubuntu 18.04 machine!

Running headless VirtualBox inside Nested KVM

For the Ceph training at 42on I use VirtualBox to build Virtual Machines. This is because they work under MacOS, Windows and Linux.

For the internal Git at 42on we use Gitlab and I wanted to use Gitlab’s CI to build my Virtual Machines automatically.

As we don’t have any physical hardware at 42on (everything runs in the cloud) I wanted to see if I could run VirtualBox Headless inside a VM with Nested KVM enabled.

Nested KVM

The first thing I checked was if my KVM Virtual Machine actually supported Nested KVM. This can be verified with the kvm-ok command under Ubuntu:

root@glrun01:~# kvm-ok 
INFO: /dev/kvm exists
KVM acceleration can be used
root@glrun01:~#

Now that’s verified I tried to install VirtualBox.

VirtualBox

Installing VirtualBox is straight forward. Just add the repository and install the packages. Don’t forget to reboot afterwards to make sure all kernel modules are loaded and properly installed.

apt-get install virtualbox

VirtualBox Extension Pack

The trick to get everything working properly is to install Oracle’s VirtualBox Extension Pack. It took me a while to figure out that I need to install it manually. It wasn’t done by default after install.

You need to download the pack and install it using the VBoxManage command.

wget http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/5.0.24/Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.0.24.vbox-extpack
vboxmanage extpack install Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.0.24.vbox-extpack
vboxmanage list extpacks
vboxmanage setproperty vrdeextpack "Oracle VM VirtualBox Extension Pack"

With that installed and configured I rebooted the machine again just to be sure.

It works!

With that it actually worked. The VirtualBox VMs can now be built inside a Nested KVM machine controlled by Gitlab’s CI 🙂